Now that Samsung has launched all of its flagships for this year, attention is slowly but surely shifting to its next flagship line Galaxy S23. It should be presented at the beginning of the following year. The battery certification of the Plus-branded model has surfaced in the ether these days, and its timing suggests that it will indeed be the case.
The battery it will use Galaxy S23+, appeared in the certification database of the Safety Korea regulator. Since the battery Galaxy S22 + got certified last september, row Galaxy The S23 could be introduced next February.
The battery bears the model number EB-BS916ABY and is manufactured by the Chinese company ATL, which also supplies batteries for foldable smartphones Galaxy Z Fold4 and Z Flip4. Unfortunately, the certification does not indicate its capacity (it is not even visible in its photo, because the text is blurred), but it is possible that it will be 4500 mAh as in Galaxy S22 +.
It is more than likely that the standard and top model batteries will be certified soon Galaxy S23, and this time we will hopefully find out their capacity as well. All models should otherwise feature the next flagship chip Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, improved cameras (u S23Ultra the main camera will boast a resolution 200 MPx) and new software features.
Is it really such a problem to put 5000mAH in the phone?
I don't understand why it's not standard today. I would not buy a phone with less than 4500mAH today, and to put this in a category where top components are expected, this really surprises me...
Admittedly, this is somewhat surprising. It's understandable for Apple, because it has a battery-debugged chip and other hardware, but here it's a big question if it can pull it off. But maybe Samsung is afraid of excessive heating, so they solve it by reducing the capacity - so if this can have any effect, which I don't know, I'm not a physicist.