At the beginning of September he presented Apple the new generation of their iPhones. Of course, they caused quite a stir, not only because of what's new in the iPhone 14 Pro models, but also because of how few changes have taken place in the basic model, i.e. the iPhone 14. It also reached our editorial office, so we can give it an objective user view Androidu.
It goes without saying that even though Samsung phones are the best sellers in the world when it comes to the premium phone segment, it Apple clearly rolling. If Samsung leads especially in the sale of cheap devices, Apple paradoxically, it sells more of its most expensive models. After all, the cheap phone doesn't have one, even though it's here iPhone SE 3rd generation, which just recycles old technology and doesn't seem like a very good buy in any way.
You could be interested in
The display is a big bummer
iPhone 14 falls more into the basic range, as it lacks any epithet – Pro, Max and Plus. So it sticks to the 6,1" display. Apple however, this year he cut the mini model and replaced it with the Plus model, as if he had joined the game of the trend of larger displays, and it is therefore a question of how long customers will suffer with this "small" device. World Androidu is bigger after all, even though Samsung is too Galaxy S22 offers the same diagonal size, it is a unique phenomenon in the portfolio of the South Korean manufacturer, because even the models of the series Galaxy And they are already bigger.
Gallery
The display of the iPhone 14 is pleasing at first glance, but its technologies are not even up to the current cutting edge, and that is of course a problem. It does not have an adaptive refresh rate and does not even reach 120 Hz. It simply means that if you are used to yours Android device with a higher frequency, that iPhone 14 display will pull your eyes a lot. While the animations are smooth and fast, the display technology makes them jerky.
Gallery
Of course, there is no Dynamic Island, just a simple cut-out which Apple redesigned in the iPhone 13 generation. So no change here. You're always on Apple also reserved only for use with the 14 Pro models, although depending on how this function on iPhonech looks, it doesn't really matter because she's just plain awful. Of course, the company blames this on the absence of the adaptive refresh rate of other models. But he could have given the iPhone 14 at least the one from the iPhone 13 Pro, which does not start at one Hz, but at 10 Hz. However, no, a fix must be enough for regular users, if they want more, let them pay.
You could be interested in
Performance with a question mark
Whatever you have Android with any chipset, Apple just can't match it with its current A series chips. But it is also largely due to the differences in the system, so it is still necessary to take into account that in such a case apples and pears are being compared (almost literally speaking). But because of the chip crisis Apple changed its strategy and did not put the top A16 Bionic in the iPhone 14, only the A15 Bionic chip, which it presented together with the iPhone 13 Pro, beats in them. So it is this chip, not the one that iPhones 13 have, which have one less graphics core.
Gallery
As silly as it sounds, it doesn't really matter, at least for now. iPhone 14 doesn't stutter, everything on it flies perfectly, it doesn't suffocate, it just warms up slightly. After all, even devices with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. RAM memory Apple it doesn't show because we shouldn't really care about its size. On the one hand, he is right, because iOS he is not as demanding on her as Android. iPhone So 14 has 6 GB of RAM, but take that as additional and meaningless information.
Gallery
To a certain extent, the durability of the device is related to the performance. It is a bit of a paradox that it can handle even with a 3279mAh battery iPhone 14 what other phones with 5000mAh battery. That's of course a full day of normal use where you'll still have some juice left at the end. Apple it simply knows how to optimize performance with the ideal battery size and the operating system used, that must be acknowledged. However, it's still true that you can find phones on the market that last longer, and that's only in Apple's own stable in the form of Max models (and now Plus again).
You could be interested in
Cameras without a major shift
Apple tries his best in the quality of his iPhone photography skills, and he succeeds. They provide relatively reliable and realistic results, in ideal conditions with minimal noise and exemplary sharpness. But its ultra-wide-angle lens still smears the sides, which limits its use, and Apple here it still ignores the telephoto lens, which is also offered by the mentioned one Galaxy S22. So it's a question of what do you prefer - the quality and fidelity of scene rendering, or more options and creativity when playing with zoom?
Gallery
It is a big question here, why keep chasing the quality of the result, when in the end the vast majority of our photos remain trapped in the phone gallery anyway, and if we print something, we print it anyway in a size that does not show the quality of the camera in the end anyway. And the lenses of the iPhone 14 are so much more protruding that it's uncomfortable. This is evident when working with the phone on a flat surface (table) and picking up dirt. And that's neither pretty nor practical, because you can't avoid constantly cleaning the lenses.
Gallery
Apple however, it again mentions how many times the quality of photos from the new iPhone has improved, even in low light conditions. But when you improve something already great, you can hardly see the differences with the naked eye anyway, and it looks like chasing numbers, nothing else. By the way, there is still only a dual 12 MPx camera, no 48 MPx as in the 14 Pro models. But what Apple has succeeded in is action mode. It's unbelievable how well its stabilization can work even while running. After all, see for yourself.
You could be interested in
The price is just a problem
Without unnecessary preoccupation and with an objective view, it is necessary to say that iPhones are still nice phones that are unrivaled in their performance and software support. But they're already losing some of that equipment, especially when it comes to their displays. If we look at the price, we climb well above 20, where one would expect something better (the basic iPhone 14 costs 26 CZK). The fact that they don't have a telephoto lens is quite understandable, it doesn't belong in the middle class, and it's simply the basic range of iPhones, even if it's priced at the highest end.
When I stand next to each other iPhone 14, Galaxy S22 (CZK 21) a Galaxy From the Flip4 (CZK 27), my decision is relatively clear as to which phone I would go for. Although it is Galaxy S22 great phone, it's actually as boring as itself iPhone 14. Fortunately, it offers at least the optical zoom. Even if Samsung's current puzzle doesn't have it, it's still a unique, original and fun device that the company itself is putting directly against iPhones. And she also knows why she's doing it, and that's because she could really talk the hesitant shooters down. But the question is whether apple growers are willing to leave the nicely fenced world for this iOS.
Phones Galaxy For example, you can buy the S22 here
So you would choose samsung just because of the price, that is very valid 😀
I guess . the article is out of whack android.
I would also choose Samsung when it costs 26 taka and has 60 Hz crap from 123
That makes sense.
Just because of the price, well, that's why he would choose the more expensive one... That makes sense...
They are all scams, both Samsung and Apple. You really don't know what to do with money when you buy such an expensive mobile phone.
As for the complaints about the iPhone. You couldn't possibly have had worse arguments. The fact that the display does not have 120Hz and adaptive RR is probably the reason that you took from the comparator from Alza. But in real use it is completely irrelevant and the disinterested user will not appreciate it. If this is a reason for you to buy, slap funus brain on the wall.
If you don't know the difference between 60/120 Hz, there is something wrong with you.
that's the view of a person who doesn't have 120hz, once you get used to it, you'll recognize it. You can live without it, but you don't want to use such an expensive device
again and better:
There is no difference between 60hz and 120hz - that's the view of a person who doesn't have 120hz, how do you get used to it and then get a device with 60hz, then you can tell that something is wrong. It is possible to live without it, but with such an expensive device one does not want to make compromises.
And what is the reason to buy iphone, when the S22 cost ten liters less and isn't the lowend fucked up?
It's written on some feta, isn't it? It is impossible to clean it, let alone think about it somehow - what did the author mean by it. E.g.: it's all a big deal and then the paradox about the flashlight. I read it 3 times and I don't know if I should be happy or hate the battery.
The problem with Samsung is that where I don't have a signal with it, it does iphonem yes Their wifi calling is another disaster. It works on the iPhone. That seems more important to me than the photo.
Well written. But today's reviewers are still only concerned about the frequency of the display and the quality of the camera, which are parameters that 70% of users are not really interested in. They're just numbers good for teenage bragging rights, having the same value as "how fast it's going" or "so many girls already".
They are interested in how long it will last, if it will be easy to control and if it will bring some social prestige. It's about it. The high-end Samsung does not stand out from the other high-ends androidí phones, as well as its low-end models are something you don't want to have at home. Apple even with his lowend he is somewhere else.
So why are you Apple not buy? Because for the same amount of music and increased prestige, one has to pay completely meaningless money. A phone is not an investment, it's money spent, in Apple's case too much money for a ridiculous year and a half.
I no longer see any prestige in it. I rather think that the person is crazy. Apple it no longer has the reputation it used to have and iPhone users are gradually moving to Samsung. I recently looked in the store at
Apple MCbook Air and for 50 CZK it didn't even have a touch screen 😀 it's a mockery to all users..
God, a laptop that doesn't have a touch screen. Well, no. What kind of laptop is this? 😂😂😂😂
So buy a Lejnovo for 35k that you won't be able to use in 3 years 😀
in the end he killed it, he analyzes all the technical parameters, how it works, what features it has/doesn't have, and in the end he would choose the flip because it is interesting and unwatched. When I go to choose a car, I will discuss all the technical data, drive it, and then I will choose purple, because it is a nice color 😉