Samsung will soon introduce a series Galaxy S23, which will show the direction of the brand in 2023. We are not expecting much, but it is clear that some news will arrive after all. Upgrading the Ultra's main camera from 108 to 200 MPx will be one of the biggest changes, but it may also turn out to be one of the most unnecessary, as we've already informed you. But what I'm really looking forward to is the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip.
Samsung should no longer discriminate against us and the whole range should be powered by a Qualcomm chip, in all markets around the world. Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in line Galaxy The S22 easily outperformed its own Exynos 2200, but even so, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 wasn't as good as it could have been, due to it being manufactured by Samsung's foundries instead of TSMC, meaning it didn't reach its full potential.
Only the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 produced by TSMC is present in the jigsaws Galaxy 2022's Z Fold and Z Flip showed us what this chip is really capable of. Despite the not very large batteries they have Galaxy From Fold4 i Galaxy Excellent performance and optimization from Flip4. In addition, they don't heat up that much. But if the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is interesting with its specifications, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is in the models Galaxy The S23 provides impressive performance, battery life and minimal heating.
Snapdragon also in Europe, 3x cheers
For us, the most important thing is that European users should also enjoy it. Here too, Samsung should distribute new flagships with Snapdragon and get rid of Exynos this year, at least in its flagship phones. Until the alleged and completely in-house Exynos chip appears, which will be manufactured by a new chip development division instead of Samsung Semiconductors, the Korean giant should stick with Qualcomm's Snapdragon chips and have them manufactured by TSMC.
It is obvious that Samsung is currently lagging behind both in the production of its own chips for smartphones and in their production for others. And maybe it's time for the company to accept these shortcomings and keep Exynos chips away from customers until it develops a really solid version of it that it can be proud of. We will thank him for this by praising his products, which do not suffer from diseases like many others Galaxy S22.
And I'm looking forward to how Snap will heat up like an iron and then it will be written here that Exynos could have handled this better. I'm happy for 2200 on my plus and Snap by no chance.
Before they made a few optimizations and an update (a few months), the 22 ultra also heated. And it certainly cannot be said that it would be perfect in terms of response. Experience with other phones.
I don't know. I love Samsung with Exynos. In addition, the last generation was not completely one-sidedly for Snapdragon. Samsung was better at something.
We are definitely fans of Exynos too. We just wish it was made exactly for the given phone models and not unified for anyone who buys it. That's where the root of all performance and heating problems lies, when the rest of the chip's hardware isn't properly tuned.
For a long time I did not understand what kind of overheating everyone keeps talking about. It only occurred to me in Spain, where at times I felt like my phone was going to catch fire and I put it in my girlfriend's purse because it couldn't be carried in my pocket 😀
Well, that's pretty extreme...
I would be quite interested in what the author would like to finance the development of Samsung chips, if not by selling them. It's nice to wish Samsung would keep them away from customers, but in that case they can just shut it down.
That by not making them at all, when they made them worse than the competition.? 🙄
As long as they don't come up with a cooling solution, the sponding will be completely useless, both with the SD and the EX. What good is super performance when after half an hour of playing, the cpu and gpu start underclocking to cool down. Quite to the point.
Where does the article say something about a function that (us) is supposed to get excited about?