Recently, the alleged complete ones were leaked specifications phone and now he appeared Galaxy A34 5G chip also in the benchmark, according to which its European version will have a MediaTek chip instead of its own Exynos.
Although according to unofficial information it will be Galaxy A34 5G use the same chipset as Galaxy A33 5G, i.e. Exynos 1280, according to the Geekbench benchmark, which the website pointed out Galaxy Club, at least its European and Korean versions will be powered by the Dimensity 1080 chip. This octa-core chipset has two high-performance Cortex-A78 processor cores clocked at 2,6 GHz and six economical Cortex-A55 cores with a frequency of 2 GHz.
Galaxy The A34 5G may not be Samsung's only upcoming mid-range phone to use two chips. Recently introduced Galaxy A14 5G it is powered by the Dimensity 700 chipset in some markets and the Exynos 1330 in others.
Galaxy Otherwise, the A34 5G should get a Super AMOLED display with a diagonal of 6,4 or 6,5 inches and a refresh rate of 90 Hz, 6 or 8 GB of RAM and 128 or 256 GB of internal memory, a triple camera with a resolution of 48 or 50, 8 and 5 MPx and a battery with a capacity of 5000 mAh and support for 25W fast charging. In terms of software, it will apparently be built on Androidat 13 and superstructure One UI 5.0. We can also expect an under-display fingerprint reader, stereo speakers and water resistance according to the IP67 standard. The phone should be introduced - along with the sibling Galaxy A54 5G – already the next one week.
I would be quite interested in why the manufacturer makes it so complicated, instead of producing one device for the whole world.
One device? To be as stupid as an apple? You're not serious
But we're talking about chip variants here, not devices. In addition, i Apple split the chips used in the iPhone 14 series.
It's a question of money. If the used chip is cheaper but comparable in performance, you can save a lot on it. That is why it was also common to put our own Exynos in the S series and in the rest of the world to give Qualcomm solutions. But it is true that here in that case the decision is rather strange.