Although Samsung intends to present its top line of smartphones for 2023 only on February 1st, thanks to the number of leaks we can already get an idea of what news it will bring. So here you can see the comparison Galaxy S23+ vs. Galaxy S22+ and how they will differ from each other and also be similar.
Display
- 6,6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X with 2340 x 1080 pixels (393 ppi), adaptive refresh rate 48 to 120 Hz, HDR10+
As far as the paper specifications are concerned, we won't see much change here. But is it really necessary when what we already have here works really well? We do not know the maximum brightness, from which we expect a certain increase, the glass covering the display should nevertheless be Gorilla Glass Victus 2 technology, last year it was Gorilla Glass Victus+.
Gallery
Chip and memory
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen2
- 8 GB RAM
- 256/512GB storage
The most important thing, of course, is that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy it replaces the Exynos 2200 chip, which we can say with peace of mind that Samsung simply didn't do very well. It sure is interesting Galaxy The S23+ will come with 256GB of base memory, up from 128GB last year. RAM remains at 8 GB.
Cameras
- Wide angle: 50 MPx, angle of view 85 degrees, 23 mm, f/1.8, OIS, dual pixel
- Ultra wide angle: 12 MPx, angle of view 120 degrees, 13 mm, f/2.2
- Telephoto lens: 10 MPx, angle of view 36 degrees, 69 mm, f/2.4, 3x optical zoom
- Selfie camera: 12 MPx, angle of view 80 degrees, 25 mm, f/2.2, HDR10+
The specifications of the main trio of cameras are completely identical. But we don't yet know the sizes of the individual sensors, so even if the resolution and brightness are the same, increasing the pixels can also improve the resulting photo. In addition, we expect considerable software wizardry from Samsung. However, the front selfie camera will undergo changes, jumping from 10 to 12 MPx.
Gallery
Dimensions
- Galaxy S23 +: 157,8 x 76,2 x 7,6 mm, weight 195 g
- Galaxy S22 +: 157,4 x 75,8 x 7,6 mm, weight 196 g
Of course, the overall dimensions are determined by the size of the display. Even if it is the same, we will see a certain enlargement of the chassis, when the device will grow by tens of mm in height and width. But we don't know why it will be like that. The thickness remains the same, the weight will be a negligible one gram less.
Batteries and charging
- Galaxy S23 +: 4700 mAh, 45W cable charging
- Galaxy S22 +: 4500 mAh, 45W cable charging
For the battery, there is a clear improvement when its capacity in the case Galaxy The S23+ jumps by 200 mAh. However, due to the chip, the increase in endurance could realistically be greater than that provided by larger batteries.
Gallery
Connectivity and others
Galaxy The S23+ will get an upgrade in terms of wireless technology, so it will have Wi-Fi 6E over Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3 vs. Bluetooth 5.2. Of course, water resistance according to IP68, support for 5G networks and presence Androidat 13 with superstructure One UI 5.1, which the whole range will have as the first from Samsung's portfolio.
You could be interested in
There are changes here, and even if they aren't too many, that doesn't mean they won't be improvements. It is also important to realize that what we already know may not be everything (and it may not be 100% true either). Samsung inspires the world and creates the future with its revolutionary ideas and technologies, and a lot will also depend on the set price, which will play a significant role in how much it is worth for customers to switch from the generation they use and, possibly, in how many customers of the competition Samsung can drag to its side.
The changes are pretty boring. No one will apply this. Because of the Snap heater. All hot.
They are preliminary informace, maybe we'll see something more.
I wouldn't say a camera is important to me. It's the same as the dress and suggests that Samsung has changed the Os so that it will take 50% better photos than the S22+ and the Ultra definitely won't. I couldn't say that if I didn't have a flag from this brand every year. The progress is pathetic. So where is the pixel, right?