One of the main advantages of the new top "flag" of Samsung Galaxy S23Ultra supposed to be its 200MPx camera. The website has now decided to check its quality GSMArena, who took several pictures with it outside in good light and inside in worse light. He then compared the photos with the ones he had taken Galaxy S22Ultra.
The pictures he took Galaxy The S23 Ultra at 1x, 3x and 10x zoom levels are more detailed than those captured by its predecessor at the same zoom levels. Sharpness is also better in the first case, which increases the feeling of higher details.
3x and 10x magnified photos are also noticeably sharper at Galaxy S23 Ultra. They do have a bit of noise, but that's a small price to pay for the higher level of detail. They also retain subtle textures that are simply blurred in the photos of its predecessor.
A few more photos were taken inside. It follows from them that the new Ultra can capture much more detail even in poor lighting in exchange for a little noise. The details are truly fascinating - note, for example, the Kodak Instamatic 33 lettering in the photo of the shelves, which is on Galaxy S23 Ultra fully readable while on Galaxy S22 significantly worse.
Finally, GSMArena took one sample image at full 200MPx and one at 50MPx resolution to see what the highest possible resolution offered (the previous images were taken in default mode, i.e. 12MPx resolution using pixel binning). The website noted that these photos took several seconds to complete.
Again, this is bullshit and cameras are almost the same. Nothing extra with the S23U compared to the S22, the transition makes no sense at all.
that Bass… “…Lagsungu?” are you serious? how old are you 12?… well then, yes.
Lord God pay for my iP14 PRO camera
He can go and bury himself.
just like you and your sick head.
Yes, you just have to find a video on yt comparing it to Ip14 where the apple burned in everything. The photos are terrible and even the videos are better from Samsung. Never an apple
do you mean the Lagsung video that drops every 5 seconds and is amazingly smooth and never compared to the iPhone video over the years?
Then I seriously worry about your technical knowledge and experience.
that Bass… “…Lagsungu?” are you serious? how old are you 12?… well then, yes.
I fully agree!! iPhones still have a lot of catching up to do, and that also applies to the display.
I've had the S6 Ultra for about 22 months and I don't think it's necessary to upgrade to the 23 Ultra. The S22 Ultra is already a great device. Of course, you'll find something here and there, but there's nowhere to make big leaps. AND IPhone Colleagues have 14Pro Max at work and I don't think they have to keep comparing themselves to Samsung. Everyone's taste. Those Top versions will be more than good even from Samsung and iPhone.
I don't know if it's the intention to have high sales of the S23U, but the photos on the zoom, the S22 ultra certainly doesn't make such a blurred line as you have there, now I'm writing from the S22U, I know what I'm talking about...
That's right, if they put a photo where the crown of the tree is sharp and the trunk is blurry, it's definitely not a problem with the camera. Then what do they want to compare?? …
I think it's a bad upload and it's not an intention to deceive anyone. It's a pixelated half of the photo and not a blur.