It's the best Samsung can do, anyway Galaxy The S23 Ultra failed the DXOMark photography test. Right? Photography is also a lot about subjective assessment, and the current flag of the South Korean manufacturer gives great results. In addition, its 10x periscopic lens is simply fun, which cannot be said about the 100x Space zoom.
It is true that you will actually only use it when taking pictures of the moon plus maybe just to recognize an object in the distance, not to want to work with such a photo any further - share it or print it. Even so, we have to admit that he has Galaxy The S23 Ultra is an impressive set of cameras, which is also extremely versatile and covers a wide range of use cases, whether in the field of macro photography or when you need to be closer to the subject, but you just can't get closer.
Zoom range
We haven't gotten to 200MPx photos yet, and frankly, we don't want to. Such a photo has a very limited use and an extreme data requirement, which we could not even share with you here, but it will certainly be mentioned in the review. Samsung should work primarily on the ultra-wide-angle lens, which smears the sides a lot and is prone to light reflections, but this is a problem for all phones, including iPhones.
You could be interested in
Camera specifications Galaxy S23 Ultra:
- Ultra wide camera: 12 MPx, f/2,2, angle of view 120˚
- Wide angle camera: 200 MPx, f/1,7, OIS, angle of view 85˚
- Telephoto lens: 10 MPx, f/2,4, 3x optical zoom, f2,4, angle of view 36˚
- Periscope telephoto lens: 10 MPx, f/4,9, 10x optical zoom, angle of view 11˚
- Front camera: 12 MPx, f/2,2, angle of view 80˚
We are quite used to the fact that the top models of the given manufacturers deliver first-class results under ideal lighting conditions. Bread only begins to break as the conditions worsen, i.e. with the onset of night. However, there will still be time for night photos. Just like the test of photos of the moon, to reveal if Samsung is pulling us by the nose, or if such results are really original, high-quality and actually useful for something. The 100x zoom doesn't really excel in a normal scene, as evidenced by the photos in the Zoom range gallery.
Depth of field, portrait, macro
Without professional tests and direct comparison with the competition, it cannot be said that it would Galaxy The S23 Ultra lagged somewhere, or on the contrary excelled somewhere. If you choose a mobile phone based on the quality of the cameras and you don't care about its brand, maybe the Samsung flag won't win, but if you're a fan of the South Korean manufacturer, simply put, you won't find anything better. The rest of the line Galaxy S23 same as series Galaxy Z doesn't have as many options as the current Ultra.
If you choose a mobile phone based on the quality of the cameras and you don't care about its brand, maybe the Samsung flag won't win, but if you're a fan of the South Korean manufacturer, simply put, you won't find anything better.
So the author had to think a lot! God, it's a review!!!
This is not a review, and right at the beginning I refer to DXO, where the S23 Ultra is in the second ten.
Try taking pictures of children or animals indoors. Makes you want to throw the fuck out the window.
they have already fixed it and you can use Pro mode and Gcam, its latest version already focuses the movement well.