Basic iPhone 14 has been on the market for some time now, and you could also read user impressions here Androidu after using this phone for some time. Of course, there was also the quality of the display, which we would like to pay more attention to. It clearly shows the imperfection of the iPhone itself and the stupidity of Apple, which only cares about money.
The whole series Galaxy The S22 has an adaptive display refresh rate that reaches up to 120 Hz. Even Galaxy The A53 5G can do 120Hz as well Galaxy M53 5G. Galaxy The A33 reaches at least 90 Hz, just like the Google Pixel 6. But if we are talking about the highest price level, then all the top models of different manufacturers do not skimp on their display, because that is what the user sees most often. Not like this Apple.
iPhone 14 only has a 60 Hz refresh rate, which looks outdated even on the latest device. It doesn't matter what performance, battery life, camera quality such a smartphone has, if the phone is stuck every time you look at it - these are simple numbers, because 120 is 2x more than 60, that's why all interaction is twice as smooth on 120Hz displays. Apple it's just playing on the fact that the entry-level iPhones are being bought by customers who are switching from its older entry-level iPhones, and they don't see the difference here. Indeed, if you work with iPhones 13 Pro and 14 Pro, you will see the fluidity of the animations, but as soon as you take it back in your hand iPhone 14 (or 13 and 12), so you can see the jerky movement at first glance.
Untapped potential in games too
I know of absolutely no reason why it would Apple couldn't at least use a 90Hz panel except that he wants to direct all potential buyers to rather iPhone 14 Pro, which is an upgrade for CZK 7. Another reason the iPhone 000's 60Hz display disappoints is with gaming. The A14 Bionic chip is definitely powerful enough to easily deliver more than 15 frames per second even in the most graphically demanding games. But since the iPhone 60's display is only 14Hz, you're also "locked" to just 60fps, even though your machine's GPU can push the saw significantly more. It's a huge missed opportunity that has no excuse.
iPhone 14 to iPhone The 14 Plus, which is only set to hit the market on Friday 7th October, look like a relic from an older age given the way technology is falling forward. Their cutout and 60Hz display are definitely not innovative. You will just get bored looking at them. And to be honest, the absence of a high refresh rate display is a plus iPhone 14 is a big missed opportunity to differentiate itself from the iPhone 13, which is practically indistinguishable from it. Even considering the price of CZK 26, it clearly follows from this that it appears to be a better buy Galaxy S22, i.e. still Samsung's flagship series with the same diagonal size, but it will cost you CZK 21.
Phones Galaxy For example, you can buy the S22 here
It's just a shame about Samsung's system. Otherwise, I agree.
I wouldn't buy a Samsung, though iPhone 14 is such a middle class with a flagship price tag 😀
the 14 / 14 Plus would really deserve at least 90Hz..
The human eye cannot tell the difference for anything above 60Hz. This only applies to Android users, the more, the bigger and the like. What iPhone what differentiates them is the operating system, and that makes the mobile. And from this point of view android since its inception it has been quietly crouching in a corner.
Apple is only concerned with money, but Copyshunt is primarily concerned with the well-being of the people and they have exemplary technical support and absolutely perfect service, of course 😀
Copy shunt? How old are you, 15?
That makes sense.
Everyone has the choice to buy what they want. The parameters are publicly known. Basing it on 120Hz and saying something like "it doesn't matter what kind of camera or flashlight you have" sounds like some kind of complex from a small phone or something else.
Or that Samsung would pay for similar articles and start a Hyundai-style campaign?
(I have iPhoneX and before that I had a Samsung.)
So there is one more option for me. If you still want to Apple, so he buys 14 PRO instead of 13. The price tag is almost identical and you get more. Even the aforementioned 120Hz display.
But he already u Apple does not sell, except from 3rd party. And then the question is whether the new iP14 features are worth it and isn't it better to buy iPhone 13.
What you definitely get extra with the crossbar is weight. I only have a 12 Pro, my wife is a basic 13, and I envy her how "light" it is, the few grams of difference can really be felt in my hand. If he had iPhone 13 mini telephoto lens, so I wouldn't hesitate, you can't actually feel it in your hand 🙂
As someone mentioned here, you have a choice. If I wanted to Android phone, so I go to the S22, which is actually the only "compact" phone with reasonable performance, construction quality and functionality.
The last thing I would be interested in is some kind of 120Hz refresh. I am writing from Galaxy The Tab S8+ has a 120Hz display and one of the first things I did after turning it on was to switch it to 60Hz, at home I used a 4k monitor with 30Hz for a while just so I didn't have to have two cables to the laptop, one to the monitor and the other to the docking station, which only had HDMI 1.4. When I removed the dock and connected the monitor directly via USB-C and had a 60Hz refresh, I didn't even notice it.
Now I have a 100Hz monitor and it is still on at 60Hz…
There are many people who do not see any advantage in a 120Hz display.